The organization of a task and the execution of a task should be viewed as two sides of the same coin.Â
Many people are strongly oriented as either organizers or executors. The organizers are generally the most prepared to tackle the task at hand, but are least likely to go about the actual business of tackling said task.Â
Often such is the case that organizers are placing excessive emphasis on preparedness as a means of compensating for an ever-increasing anxiety stemming from the very idea of willing oneself to move on to the next step.Â
As such, organizers who lack the general moxie to engage in the process of carrying out their ideas tend to fall short in terms of manifesting their potential.Â
The executors, or the doers, tend fare a bit better, despite their general lack of foresight as relating to what is required to avoid the collapse of a plan under the pressure of forces external and otherwise.Â
This is because, in many ways, execution itself is a numbers game. If you keep shooting long enough, you’ll eventually hit something – and even if the trajectory of the shot is less effective than that of the one in perpetual planning, 20% effectiveness is more substantial than 90% effectiveness when the shot with 90% effectiveness fails to exit the chamber.Â
Failure to regulate the organization process can result in the squandering of untold amounts of time and energy with very little to show for the trouble in terms of actual results.Â
On the other side of the coin, too little care in organization can lead to the haphazard implementation of half-baked endeavors, which will return only a fraction of the desired result at best.Â
The individual that can perfect the balance between organization and execution, however, promises to emerge as a true threat. This balancing act, one of the mind and spirit, lies at the center of the human condition.Â
In aligning our senses and motivations, we set the stage for the manifestation of our own thoughts, ideas, and goals into tangible sectors of our own reality.Â