WASHINGTON, D.C. (LOOTPRESS) — A bipartisan group of U.S. senators has introduced new legislation that would allow Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to purchase hot rotisserie chicken using their benefits.
The proposal, known as the Hot Rotisserie Chicken Act, is being led by Jim Justice, alongside John Fetterman, Shelley Moore Capito, and Michael Bennet.
If passed, the bill would update current SNAP rules, which prohibit the purchase of hot, prepared foods. Under existing guidelines, recipients can buy rotisserie chicken only after it has been cooled—an often-criticized technicality supporters say makes little practical sense.
Sen. Justice called the change “common sense,” emphasizing the benefit for families who need quick, affordable meal options. “It’s about helping parents and grandparents put a healthy, protein-rich meal on the table without the time and effort it takes to cook,” he said.
Sen. Fetterman echoed that sentiment, pointing to the affordability of rotisserie chicken as a key factor for families trying to stretch their budgets. Sen. Capito added that the change would improve convenience and dignity for seniors and working families, particularly those without reliable access to cooking equipment.
Supporters argue the bill addresses an outdated rule that forces stores to cool down hot food before it can be purchased with SNAP benefits—potentially increasing costs and reducing food quality.
The legislation would amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to specifically allow the purchase of hot rotisserie chicken. It would not expand SNAP funding, eligibility, or allow recipients to purchase other hot foods or restaurant meals.
A companion bill is also being led in the House by Rick Crawford, signaling bipartisan support across both chambers of Congress.
The proposal has also drawn backing from the National Chicken Council, which says rotisserie chicken remains one of the most affordable and accessible sources of protein for families nationwide.
The bill comes as lawmakers continue to look for ways to make food assistance programs more practical and responsive to everyday needs.
